A Bill of Material (BOM) at its core is a very simple
concept. It is a list of components needed to manufacture a finished product.
So if one was making a pair of spectacles, the BOM may look as follows:
Finished Product
|
Spectacles
|
Quantity
|
Item 1
|
Right Lens
|
1
|
Item 2
|
Left Lens
|
1
|
Item 3
|
Frame
|
1
|
Item 4
|
Hinge
|
2
|
It must be said that understanding how a BOM functions is
fundamental to understanding how PLM systems work as this simple list is really
at the core of the system. However, simple concepts have a tendency to escalate
into very complex subjects. And so it is with a BOM.
One of the complexities associated with a BOM is that an
organization usually has a requirement for different types of a BOM in order to
define a single product. Most manufacturing companies have at least three
types:
- EBOM (Engineering BOM) is the list of parts that
engineers are responsible for and comprises all the components that require
some sort of design input
- MBOM (Manufacturing BOM) is the list of parts
that are required to actually make the product. This is typically different
from EBOM by components that engineering do not specifically design (glue
strips, liquid fills etc.). It may also be plant specific.
- XBOM (Service BOM) is an as built list of parts used in a product that actually made it off the factory floor. This may be different from what was originally specified by the MBOM because of crisis during manufacture. It is important from a customer service perspective.
- No BOM – No product
- Wrong BOM – Factory rework or customer dissatisfaction.
Hence the analogy in the title; BOM management may be a
hidden problem that is set to explode in an organization, especially if the
products been made become more complex. PLM systems can offer a single
organized BOM that represents all the different types in a consistent,
controlled manner. Given the potential consequences of the bomb exploding, BOM
in PLM should be a priority.